Tag: #childhoodcancer

#JournalClubwithFederica:How small RNAs contribute to neuroblastoma biology

We’ve recently started a new journal club series focusing on papers published by our research group over the past few years. The paper I chose is titled “A Context-Dependent Role for MiR-124-3p on Cell Phenotype, Viability and Chemosensitivity in Neuroblastoma in vitro“. It explores the anti-cancer potential of miR-124-3p in neuroblastoma.

Neuroblastoma is particularly challenging to treat, especially when tumours become resistant to chemotherapy. This resistance is compounded by tumour heterogeneity—these cancers comprise different cell types, specifically adrenergic and mesenchymal cells. This variability affects treatment responses and plays a role in metastasis and how aggressively the cancer can spread.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small RNA molecules that regulate gene expression, and miR-124-3p has emerged as a promising player in cancer research. A Kaplan–Meier plot in the study (Figure 1) shows a strong association between low miR-124-3p levels and poorer survival rates in neuroblastoma patients, underscoring its potential impact on patient outcomes.

Our group’s study specifically examined how miR-124-3p might help reverse chemotherapy resistance and inhibit tumour cell growth in neuroblastoma. Excitingly, it has the potential to reduce cancer cell survival and increase their sensitivity to chemotherapy—an important breakthrough for treating resistant neuroblastomas.

The study found that miR-124-3p directly targets genes involved in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a process that makes cancer cells more invasive and treatment-resistant. By suppressing these genes, miR-124-3p can reverse EMT, shifting cells to a less aggressive, more treatment-sensitive state. Our group observed that increased miR-124-3p significantly reduced neuroblastoma cell invasion (Figure 2). In SK-N-AS cells and their drug-resistant form, invasion dropped by 50% and 70%. In Kelly cells and their resistant form, invasion decreased by 10% and 30%. The most invasive of all, the drug-resistant SK-N-ASCis24 cells, showed the most substantial decrease in invasion after miR-124-3p treatment. This suggests that miR-124-3p could help limit neuroblastoma spread, highlighting its therapeutic potential.

While miR-124-3p isn’t part of my project, seeing how different molecular mechanisms can be harnessed to develop cancer therapies is always inspiring. Using miRNAs to sensitize resistant cancer cells to treatment could complement approaches like immunotherapies or vaccines, like the one I’m working on. Understanding these molecular pathways brings fresh perspectives on weakening cancer cells and making treatments more effective.

Written by Federica Cottone

National PPI Festival 2024: Let’s Talk About Childhood Cancer Research

The RCSI Cancer Bioengineering Group hosted an in-person event during the National PPI Festival 2024 to share their childhood cancer research and connect with the public and patients.

We welcomed members of the public, family members of children with cancer, researchers, clinicians, and patient/community organisations on October 17th. Our past lab members and students paid a visit, too! Our group shared ongoing research on neuroblastoma biology and finding new treatments. Prof Cormac Owens from CHI brought us through the journey of clinical trials in neuroblastoma patients. We heard the heartbreaking story of the brave young man who lost his life to neuroblastoma and his parents who never gave up. This truly inspirational family founded a charity – the Conor Foley Neuroblastoma Cancer Research Foundation, to support curiosity-driven and translationally-focused research. The Foleys know very well how important it is to return happy days to kids and their families.

We thank RCSI PPI Ignite for supporting us!

Stay in touch!

#JournalClubwithEve: Unraveling Neuroblastoma Metastasis – My Exciting PhD Journey into 3D Models

As a new PhD student, I’m incredibly excited to dive into cancer research, and what better way to kick off this journey than by exploring 3D models to study neuroblastoma metastasis? Neuroblastoma is one of the most common childhood cancers, and about 50% of patients have metastatic disease at diagnosis. Understanding how these cells spread is key to developing better therapies, which is why this recent study by Gavin et al. (2021) caught my eye.

So, what did the researchers do? They used something called patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and cell lines to grow organoids (tiny mini-tumors) in a 3D extracellular matrix (ECM). This ECM mimics the environment these cells would encounter in the body, which is super important because cells behave very differently in 3D than in the typical 2D Petri dishes. It’s like giving the cells an entire landscape to explore rather than just a flat road—suddenly, they have mountains to climb and valleys to cross, allowing them to behave much more like they would inside the body!

One of the coolest things about this study is how the neuroblastoma cells developed various invasion strategies based on their environment. Some stayed in tightly knit groups, while others decided to go full-on lone wolf, sending out long, thin projections to explore the surrounding matrix. These cells are smart-adapting to different ECM compositions like Matrigel (which is rich in laminin and collagen), made them change their behaviour entirely. It’s like they’re navigating an obstacle course, with each new challenge requiring a different tactic!

Let’s Talk Actin Filaments!

Now, this is where it gets super cool (and nerdy in the best way!). The images captured by confocal microscopy are stunning. They show actin filaments—the internal skeleton of the cells—as they help the cancer cells move and invade new areas. The actin filaments form these amazing, intricate networks that shape the cells and allow them to stretch and invade. It’s almost like watching tiny construction workers build bridges and tunnels as they move forward. Check out this confocal image showing the red filaments—how awesome is that?!

Written by Eve O’Donoghue

September – Childhood Cancer Awareness Month, 2024

Cancer is the 2nd most common cause of death among children after accidents. 

Childhood cancer is an umbrella term for many other types of this disease. Every September, many charities, researchers and parents of children with cancer work hard to raise awareness of this cancer. You may learn more about kids with cancer, their loving families, the doctors and caregivers who look after them and treat them, the young survivors of cancer and those kids and teens who lost their battle, and the scientists who work hard to find a way to stop childhood cancer.

This year, our research team will run the Pub Quiz on September 18th, 2024, in honour of Childhood Cancer Awareness Month. All donations will go to the Conor Foley Neuroblastoma Research Foundation (CFNRF).

If you would like to get involved in this amazing challenge and help us raise vital funds for childhood cancers, you can contribute to our fundraising page:

#JournalClubwithRabia: How Can Fish Help Us Study Anticancer Drugs?

Hi all! Rabia here, I came across an intriguing paper highly relevant to my work on the rapid in vivo validation of HDAC inhibitor-based treatments using neuroblastoma zebrafish xenografts. The study outlines a zebrafish neuroblastoma yolk sac model specifically designed to evaluate both the effectiveness and toxicity of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors.

HDAC inhibitors are drugs that target specific enzymes involved in gene regulation. This study tested broad-spectrum HDAC inhibitors as standalone treatments and combined them with doxorubicin, a well-known chemotherapy drug.

But why on Zebrafish? The zebrafish model provides a rapid and efficient means of testing these treatments, offering valuable insights into their potential use in combating neuroblastoma. This model allows for assessing drug efficacy and helps understand the associated toxicities quickly, making it a powerful tool for developing new anti-cancer therapies.

In the study, fish larvae were implanted with fluorescently labelled, well-established neuroblastoma cell line (SK-N-BE(2)-C) and patient samples (HD-N33, NB-S-124) to grow tumours. Non-cancerous cells (VH7 fibroblasts) were utilized to verify that tumour progression in zebrafish was specific to tumour cells. The engraftment of human cells into fish larvae was confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining on zebrafish sections injected with neuroblastoma cells (SK-N-BE). This was achieved using a STEM121 antibody that reacts specifically with a human cytoplasmic protein. The findings showed that pediatric tumour cells survive and grow in the zebrafish model at rates like those observed in human tumours.

Before testing drug efficacy in zebrafish xenografts, optimal drug concentrations and maximal tolerated doses (MTD) were determined. Toxicity tests were conducted by treating fish larvae cells for three days without tumour cell injection to identify the maximum tolerated dose that did not cause observable morbidity, changes in morphology, or severe aberrations in larval behaviour. and lethal dose (LD) for each compound. To find optimal drug concentrations, larvae with xenografted tumour cells were incubated with increasing drug doses 24 hours post-implantation to the maximally tolerated dose (MTD). The relative IC50 values were then determined based on changes in tumour mass volume.

To evaluate the treatment, SK-N-BE(2)- cells were used to test the broad-spectrum HDAC inhibitors, including panobinostat, vorinostat, and tubastatin A, both alone and combined with doxorubicin. The partial response rate (PR) was measured to see how well different drug combinations work to shrink tumours in the zebrafish model. Here’s what they found: Doxorubicin combined with panobinostat resulted in a 23% PR, Doxorubicin combined with tubastatin A showed a 31% PR, and Doxorubicin combined with vorinostat achieved the best result with a 36% PR.

To test the effectiveness of the HDAC inhibitor treatment, they monitored the tumour growth using a confocal microscope before and 48 hours after giving the drug. The test revealed that a 48-hour treatment of SK-N-BE (2)-C zebrafish xenografts with vorinostat and doxorubicin alone, `and in combination, increased cell death. The combination of these two drugs was the most effective, causing a significant increase in cancer cell death (apoptosis) by decreasing cell proliferation, as indicated by reduced PPH3 marker and activating the number of Cleaved caspase-3 (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Treatment for 48 h with Vorinostat, doxorubicin, or a combination of both increased the amount of cleaved caspase-3 and reduced mitotic tumour cells. Adapted from Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13(11), 345

In essence, this study validates the use of HDAC inhibitors in treating neuroblastoma and paves the way for broader applications of zebrafish models in cancer research. As we look to the future, these innovative models could significantly enhance our ability to develop effective cancer therapies, making strides towards better treatments and, ultimately, more effective cures.

Written by Rabia Saleem

#JournalClub with Shreya: Modelling Brain Tumour Spread

This article by Krieger et al. discusses the most common form of brain cancer called glioblastoma. Due to its highly aggressive nature, research must be conducted consistently and rapidly to develop new treatments. This has proven challenging due to primary tumours being resected before further research can be done, as well as the lack of current technologies to fully explore relationships between GBM and surrounding brain tissues. This study aimed to study the aforementioned interactions in under 4 weeks, accounting for the rapid progression of the disease in real life.  

GBM cells were first derived from four patients and treated with glutamine, heparin, epidermal and fibroblast growth factors, then underwent a sequence of manipulations, such as second-generation replication lentivirus infection of GBM cells, iPSC line 409b2 inoculation in Aggrewell plates and later manipulation with invasion assays, and scRNA sequencing, which, along with the Aggrewell cells, produced neural progenitor cell spheroids for analysis. Confocal microscopy and the developed image processing algorithm allowed for visualization of these cells following fluoroscopy and depicted consistent growth of tumour cells. There was also the growth of microtubules. Any dissociated organoids were then co-cultured with GBM cells again, promoting interaction between the two. Further analysis revealed the upregulation of 45 genes, including PAX6, GJA1, GPC3, and others involved in cell regulation.  

Credit to Teresa G Krieger, Stephan M Tirier, Jeongbin Park, Katharina Jechow, Tanja Eisemann, Heike Peterziel, Peter Angel, Roland Eils, Christian Conrad, Modeling glioblastoma invasion using human brain organoids and single-cell transcriptomics, Neuro-Oncology, Volume 22, Issue 8, August 2020, Pages 1138–1149

In conclusion, this novel mechanism of analysis of GBM cells using Aggrewell plates provided fruitful results, indicating intricate relationships between GBM cells and organoids, providing crucial insight for treatments by elucidating specific gene expression, heterogeneity of cells, and offering new targets based on ligand-receptor interactions. The particular relevance of this study to my work is regarding the usage of Aggrewell plates, which I am currently studying to determine how best to keep cells growing successfully within the wells. This article proves the usability and efficiency of Aggrewell and establishes its crucial role in the realm of brain cancer treatment research.  

Written by Shreya Sankar

How things work in science: targeting cell components.

How do researchers study cells? How do we get the nitty gritty?

We use many methods to tag and chase various cell components. One of my favourites is fluorescent microscopy. It allows the use of nearly all spectrum of colours from blue to purple in one go. However, we prefer to narrow it down to 2-3 colours and avoid their overlap.

How does it work? First, we use DAPI or Hoescht, which are blue fluorescent dyes used to stain DNA. This way, we tag the nucleus of the cell. Then, we tag a protein of interest. In our case, it was MYCN, a protein that acts as a transcription factor. MYCN amplification is associated with poor prognosis in neuroblastoma. As a transcription factor, it binds to genomic DNA and is located in the nucleus. We used a specific antibody that was labelled with a green fluorescent dye. Look at the image below. The green colour pattern overlaps with the blue colour. Then, we tagged the cytoskeleton, a complex of various proteins that hold the cell architecture and dynamics. We used phalloidin with red fluorescence. It is a highly selective bicyclic peptide and a popular choice for staining actin filaments.

Neuroblastoma organoids stained with DAPI, Phalloidin and anti-MYCN antibody. This work was done during the Fulbright journey to Ewald’s Lab at Johns Hopkins

Now, we can enjoy visualising cells and test different research questions. For example, how do cells respond to a drug? Or how do neuroblastoma cells spread?

Written by Olga Piskareva

Congratulations to Dr Ciara Gallagher!


Huge congrats to a newly minted Dr Ciara Gallagher!  She defended her PhD on March 8 – International Women’s Day. Your enthusiasm and perseverance are truly fascinating! May this be the stepping stone towards a brighter future, Ciara!

We thank examiners Dr Marie McIlroy (RCSI) and Prof Jan Škoda (Masaryk Uni) for the time and expertise they provided.

We also thank the Irish Research Council for their generous support!

Dr Ciara Murphy (Chair), Dr Olga Piskareva (Supervisor), Dr Ciara Gallagher, Prof Jan Skoda (examiner), Dr Marie McIlroy (Examiner)

Ever wonder how scientists figure out a specific protein’s role in cancer?

Researchers use various methods, but I employ gene knockdown in my experiments. Basically, I use small RNA molecules that specifically target and degrade the mRNA of my gene of interest. This leads to a decrease in the corresponding protein levels, enabling me to observe the effects on neuroblastoma cell behaviour.

I feel a bit like Sherlock Holmes, you know? I’m selectively putting my suspect protein – the one I’m eyeing – under the spotlight to see how it’s pulling the strings on the cell’s behaviour. It’s like I’m in a cellular mystery, complete with a gene knockout magnifying glass 🔍🧬🕵

So, what I’ve been up to these past months is knocking down my protein and trying to find answers to the following questions:

Can neuroblastoma cells survive? And if not, how do they meet their demise? Do they go on a growth spree and start proliferating? Are they capable of migration? And here’s the twist – when my protein of interest takes a dip, do other proteins decide to change their expression levels?

The picture below can probably help you get an idea of what I’ve done so far. Do you see those brighter spots in Pictures A and B? Those are dead cells. Their number indicates the proportion of dead cells after a treatment. Picture A has just a few; the majority are healthy and well-spread cells. This is our negative control, a condition when we show neuroblastoma cells that have been transfected, but no gene knockdown happened. Transfection is the term for introducing small RNA molecules. Now, in Picture B, when we knocked down the protein, it caused the death of the cells, and you can clearly see that from all those many little bright spots.

We have found answers to many of the previous questions, but new questions have arisen, and we can’t wait to answer them!

Written by Federica Cottone

International Childhood Cancer Day – 15 February 2024

We are celebrating #ICCD2024 with a Bake Sale and a Quiz. To earn a piece of cake, you have to answer a question correctly! Have a look at some:

  • Which civilisation first described cancer?
  • Where did the word cancer come from?
  • Do children get cancer?
  • What is the most common type of cancer in children?
  • Can the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine prevent cancer?
  • Can neuroblastoma begin to develop before birth?
  • What is the name of the nerve cell in which neuroblastoma begins to grow?
  • Can a child have a genetic predisposition to neuroblastoma?
  • What % stands for the incidence of neuroblastoma: 8 or 15?
  • What % stands for the neuroblastoma-related deaths: 8 or 15?
  • Does neuroblastoma first appear in the brain?
  • What does the letter N stand for in the gene MYCN?
  • How often does childhood cancer occur compared to adults?
  • How often does hereditary cancer happen in general?
  • Do you think that children are small adults when we talk about anticancer treatment?